Two events this week have helped me reflect on the ridiculous nature of historical research and how it can never be entirely complete, but also on its importance. Still very busy excavating Garnet Holme, I've now reached 1918 in the Newspaper Archive and have so many questions I want answers to, but which, to be honest, I'll probably never find.
On Wednesday, I joined the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust Research Conversation for November on Zoom, in which the inspiring Dr Varsha Panjwani was discussing "Women making Shakespeare today". In a really accessible and thoughful presentation, she drew attention to the fact that there is still a lack of documentation of how female performers approach roles in Shakespeare and a tendency to overlook the contribution of many of the female characters when writing about productions. I know there is a definite male bias in documentation around the Benson Company- largely a result of the time in which it operated - but I hadn't stopped to consider that, a century later, the 'white, male, middle class'
narrative might still be the 'received version' when it comes to theatre history. Looking at the V&A Benjamin Stone photograph, I was much more able to identify many of the actors, whereas the women in the Company were much harder to find out about. Apart from Constance Benson and Elisabeth Fagan, I haven't really found much written from the female perspective of the Company and that is a shame. What I took away from the hour was a reminder that any history is, by definition, an incomplete one.
Then, on Thursday, I took a trip to York to see Paterson Joseph's one-man show 'Sancho and Me' which proved to be, in some ways, the flip side to Dr Panjwani's talk. I'm a huge fan of Paterson Joseph - his acting AND his writing -any evening in his presence is always a starry one. His novel is based on the play he wrote about Charles Ignatius Sancho and came about because of a fascinating research rabbit hole he fell into. Unable to find answers to the questions he had about Sancho, he used creative imagination to invent a fictional narrative, using the information he did have and the experiences of others who lived at the time. His enthusiasm (- obsession? - ) was infectious. With a sense of theatrical mischief, he gave over the second part of the evening to a kind of sophisticated 'teacher in role' exercise in which he became Sancho to answer the audience's questions. It was an evening of pure joy - watching an actor communicate, move and challenge an audience through passion, energy and sheer exuberance.
And both events have made me think again about those 'unvalued jewels' that slip through the pages of history, people who may have been important, once, but didn't leave a record of their lives, just little glints here and there for us to wonder at. As I continue to sift through my own obsession's long-buried treasure, both valuable cultural encounters last week have given me pause for thought and not a little determination to keep on digging...
Anonymous squirrel in York's Museum Gardens, burying his own bits of treasure. |